Files
kotlin/compiler/testData/codegen/box/objects/objectVsClassInitialization_kt5291.kt
Mikhael Bogdanov 02d9c526e2 Proper resort variables on inlining lowered ir closures
Original problem is that lowered ir closures doesn't meet inliner expectations
 about captured variable position in inlining method.
 E.g.: Call 'foo(valueParam) { capturedParam }' to
  inline function 'foo' with declaration

      inline fun foo(valueParam: Foo, inlineParamWithCaptured: Bar.() ->) ....

 is reorganized through inlining to equivalent call foo(valueParam, capturedParam1, cp2 ...).
 But lowered closure for lambda parameter has totally different parameters order:

     fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, captured1, cp2..., valueParam1, vp2...)

 So before inlining lowered closure should be transformed to

     fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, valueParam1, vp2..., captured1, cp2..)

 #KT-28547 Fixed
2019-01-03 07:57:36 +01:00

25 lines
473 B
Kotlin
Vendored

public inline fun <T> T.with(f: T.() -> Unit): T {
this.f()
return this
}
public class Cls {
val string = "Cls"
val buffer = StringBuilder().with {
append(string)
}
}
public object Obj {
val string = "Obj"
val buffer = StringBuilder().with {
append(string)
}
}
fun box(): String {
if (Cls().buffer.toString() != "Cls") return "Fail class"
if (Obj.buffer.toString() != "Obj") return "Fail object"
return "OK"
}