Resolves the interaction of @JvmOverloads annotations and
parameterless main methods.
In the following code, both mechanisms generate methods that
ultimately produce the signature `public static void main(String[] args)`
of which there can be only one (true in general of any signature).
```
fun main() { }
@JvmOverloads
fun main(Array<String> args, x: Int = 42) { }
```
This PR simply shuffles the lowerings around, letting parameterless
main methods detect the presence of the default overload produced by
the annotation.
Additionally, this PR improves the testing of parameterless main
methods by actual bytecode patterns, and not simple check for
successful compilation (as @sfs and I discovered, there are issues in
flagging an error on duplicate signatures on the IR backend).
For example, a lambda `{ param -> captured }` of type `E.(T) -> U` will
be transformed by LocalDeclarationsLowering into a private static method
fun f$lambda-0($this: E, $captured: U, param: T) = $captured
The reason for such an ordering is that a lambda looks the same as a
local function, and local function can have default arguments, and those
arguments can reference captured variables; thus, captured variables
must come before actual declared arguments.
However, this is not the order that the inliner wants. Moreover, since
it was written to handle lambdas represented as `invoke` methods of
anonymous objects, it does not expect the actual callable method to have
any parameters corresponding to captured variables at all. This results
in it attempting to generate a temporary node with descriptor
(LE;LU;LT;LU;)LU;
while still using locals 1 and 2 as `param` and `$captured` respectively.
In the example above, this is not critical, as they both have reference
type and the lambda will eventually be pasted into a different node
anyway; however, if it happens that one of them is a primitive, or both
are primitives of different types, the bytecode will use incorrect
instructions, causing verification errors. The correct descriptor is
(LE;LT;LU;)LU;
This directory is skipped in JVM IR test generator, so they won't show
up as failed anymore.
Note that only failing tests are moved to oldLanguageVersions/. Tests
which already pass are still being run. It may be useful not to break
them in case we _do_ need to support some pre-1.3 language feature
switches in JVM IR.
Namely, anonymous objects defined in lambdas that have all captured
variables as loose fields instead of a single reference to the parent.
The question is, when a lambda inside an inline function defines an
anonymous object, and that object is not regenerated during codegen for
the inline function itself, but then has to be regenerated at call site
anyway, do we use an outer `this` or loose capture fields? For example,
before KT-28064:
inline fun f1(g: () -> Unit) = object { g() }
// -> f1$1 { $g: () -> Unit }
inline fun f2(g: () -> Unit) = f1 { object { g() } }
// -> f2$$inlined$f1$1 { $g: () -> Unit }
// f2$$inlined$f1$1$lambda$1 { this$0: f2$$inlined$f1$1 }
inline fun f3(g: () -> Unit) = f2 { object { g() } }
// -> f3$$inlined$f2$1 { $g: () -> Unit }
// f3$$inlined$f2$1$1 { this$0: f3$$inlined$f2$1 }
// f3$$inlined$f2$1$1$lambda$1 { this$0: f3$$inlined$f2$1$1 }
After KT-28064:
inline fun f2(g: () -> Unit) = f1 { object { g() } }
// -> f2$$inlined$f1$1 { $g: () -> Unit }
// f2$1$1 { $g: () -> Unit }
inline fun f3(g: () -> Unit) = f2 { object { g() } }
// -> f3$$inlined$f2$1 { $g: () -> Unit }
// f3$$inlined$f2$2 { ??? }
// f3$1$1 { $g: () -> Unit }
Should `???` be `this$0: f3$$inlined$f2$1` or `$g: () -> Unit`? This
commit chooses the latter for KT-28064 bytecode and keeps `this$0` when
inlining the old bytecode.
- Extract all backend codegen tests that specifically target behaviour
in to-be-deprecated functionality from language versions < 1.3"
- Remove those tests from the JVM IR test suite.
Given the strict pattern-matching in the inliner, this is the only way
to make it not crash when attempting to inline these stubs. Note that
the IR backend does not currently use the inliner's default method stub
handling; the crash only occurs when a module compiled with the non-IR
JVM backend is attempting to call an inline function with default
arguments defined in a module that was compiled with the IR backend.
NOTE: jvmCrossinlineLambdaDeclarationSite.kt is muted because the
inliner does not remap references to an anonymous object's parent
class after regenerating it. Unlike the JVM backend, JVM_IR uses the
top level named class' assertion status for all inner classes. (The
test used to pass because the lambda in `inline fun call` read the
`$assertionsDisabled` field of `CrossinlineLambdaContainer`, which
was not reloaded after changing the assertion status of package `test`.)
This commit:
- introduces tests explicating what is and isn't considered a
proper main method on the JVM backends.
- implements support for parameterless main methods on the JVM IR
backend
- See KT-34338 for more tests.
If the delegated property operators involved are inline, and delegated
property metadata parameter is not used (which is often the case, e.g.,
'lazy'), we can skip those properties in metadata generation.
NOT implemented: special case when only 'kProperty.name' is used by the
corresponding delegated property operators.
Also a sneak fix for KT-34060.
Avoid using a separate origin for temporary variables introduced
for for loops. That doesn't add anything and gives one more case
for optimizations to deal with.
Extend the JVM specific optimizations to remove temporary
variables to deal with more cases encountered in for loops
lowering.
Use the class of the subtype of CharSequence when available. When
it is not (for type parameters bounded by CharSequence) call the
CharSequence getter and 'get' method. Using the most specific type
posible fixes the forInStringSpecialized test that expects the
use of INVOKEVIRTUAL and not INVOKEINTERFACE.
Add tests for the type parameter use.
