Before this commit, expect super-class without constructors did not
provoke SUPERTYPE_NOT_INITIALIZED. However, it should, but only
if sub-type is normal class (not an expect one).
So #KT-24597 Fixed
In an open expected class inheriting an expected interface, abstract
members are now inherited as _open_ fake overrides, not final. Final was
technically safer but also stricter and thus could be unexpected by the
user. In a final class, abstract members are still inherited as _final_
fake overrides. So, the general rule is now the following: the modality
of an expected fake override, which overrides only abstract members, in
a non-abstract class is equal to the modality of that class
#KT-22031 Fixed
Fake overrides for abstract members from expected classes should become
non-abstract (final, in fact) in non-abstract expected subclasses
#KT-22031 Fixed
Divide incompatibility on two groups: strong and weak. Strong incompatibility means that if declaration with such incompatibility has no `actual` modifier then it's considered as usual overload and we'll not report any error on it.
#KT-20540 Fixed
#KT-20680 Fixed
Header/impl declarations are now considered fully compatible even in the
case when the impl declaration has no "impl" modifier. The error about
no "impl" is now reported separately and only on the impl declaration,
never on the header declaration
#KT-20087 Fixed
Note that the quick fix to implement header class works incorrectly when
that class has nested classes at the moment; this should be fixed
separately
#KT-15494 Fixed
#KT-18573 Fixed
Also support a quick fix to add 'impl' modifier (KT-18454), although it
doesn't work yet on classes because there's no error on them in the IDE
#KT-18087 Fixed
#KT-18452 Fixed
#KT-18454
Try to report most of the errors on the actual members of the impl
class. In many cases, there's a 1:1 mapping of header to impl class
members, so the error "some members are not implemented" on the class
declaration itself is redundant. Exceptions include functions/properties
from supertypes (there may be no other place to report a signature
mismatch error in this case), functions/properties not marked with
'impl' (the checker is only run for declarations explicitly marked with
'impl') and default constructors (the checker is not run for them)
#KT-18447 Fixed
Try to report most mismatch errors on the 'impl' declaration. Only
report a mismatch error on the 'header' declaration if no error would be
otherwise reported on any 'impl' declaration in the compilation unit.
Also render declaration kind in the message
#KT-18447 In Progress
Prepend the platform name to the diagnostic in a common module, which is
reported when sources of that common module are analyzed as a part of the
platform source set: "<!JVM:...!> ... <!>". Fix some existing tests, mostly by
adding "impl" to implementations
Properties are only allowed to be declared in a header class' primary
constructor if that class is an annotation class. However, we did not correctly
determine that such properties are also "header". The test passed because the
diagnostic was lost
