Denis Zharkov
5755af6b27
Remove wrong condition part: there could be irrelevant overrides from Kotlin
2015-10-29 21:05:52 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
94803ce1c4
Collect overrides of special builtin members in super types
...
#KT-9695 Fixed
2015-10-29 21:05:26 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
8db206e7ff
Take into account irrelevant implementation of special builtins
2015-10-21 17:51:43 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
d674aa1427
Refine signature mapping for special overrrides from Java
...
They have special JVM descriptor only when they are not inherited from
Kotlin super class
2015-10-21 17:51:43 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
155bbd40ae
Do not generate not-null assertion for argument of Collection.contains
...
Of course not only for contains but for other methods having INSTANCEOF bar.rier
Otherwise using platform null values becomes for such methods becomes
dangerous in cases like `platformString in setOf("", "")`
2015-10-16 18:16:02 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
78cfeb0d7d
Stdlib rename: List.indexOf(T), List.lastIndexOf(T), MutableCollection.removeAll(Collection<T>), MutableCollection.retainAll(Collection<T>)
2015-10-14 20:40:09 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
6322198a11
Revert 'isEmpty' transformation
2015-10-14 20:40:01 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
1305d9755a
Transform CharSequence.length to property
2015-10-14 20:39:29 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
a76a8fcc3f
Adjust various testData to remove/charAt transformation
2015-10-11 19:59:31 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
89ded4ab1d
Implement hack to support both remove() and removeAt() in MutableList<Int>
...
Also add couple of tests about CharSequence.get
2015-10-11 19:57:22 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
97ed8c83a0
Adjust testData to isEmpty/key/value transformations
2015-10-10 12:29:15 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
80da320c2c
Customize JVM signature for Collection's members
...
- Do not write signature for `contains`
- Write signature for `containsAll` as it's declared like `containsAll(Collection<?>)`
2015-10-09 14:40:33 +03:00
