Commit Graph

236 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Denis Zharkov
4d484dd971 FIR: Support java array in type argument
^KT-37321 Fixed
2020-06-03 10:43:37 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov
3acb64c536 [FIR] Add flexible default upper bound for java type parameters 2020-03-27 10:17:12 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov
7bfe7061e7 [FIR] Add proper nullability for java enums 2020-03-20 23:11:28 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
e1312a752a FIR: Allow a field override another field with the same name 2020-03-17 16:33:48 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
e051251b27 FIR: set isOperator only for Java methods with appropriate names
#KT-35133 Fixed
2020-02-19 18:09:04 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
2ad8488e6a FIR: Rewrite Java type mapping
Previoisly, there were two places where mapping had happened:
- toConeKotlinTypeWithNullability
- enhancePossiblyFlexible

The first one was used for supertypes and bounds and the second one
was used for other signature parts

The main idea is to perform type mapping once to a flexible type,
and then use it as it's needed (it's lower bound, or for the further ehnancement)

Also, this commit fixes flexibility for type arguments, see the tests
2020-02-19 15:53:34 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
95b4fa4b31 FIR: Support flexible types in getErasedVersionOfFirstUpperBound 2020-02-12 16:05:11 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
91b432b4a1 [FIR] Java super-type arguments are now handled as flexible 2020-02-03 16:45:19 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
e89c777fc6 FIR: Create DefinitelyNotNull only for annotated types 2019-12-10 14:21:21 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
f659dc0bea FIR: Add synthetic values/valueOf methods to Java classes 2019-11-27 11:20:52 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov
950d1f4fe4 [FIR] Fix enhancement of java array type 2019-11-19 10:43:46 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
bd70daa3d1 FIR Java: use definitely not-null types for type parameters
We support & use ConeDefinitelyNotNullType more properly here
2019-11-14 19:10:59 +03:00
Alexander Udalov
57a674e9e6 Make fast class files reading mode default in compiler tests
This makes sense because this mode is the default in the production
compiler. Forgetting to enable it where necessary led to different
bizarre test failures, see for example changes around 3fee84b966 and
KT-34826
2019-11-11 15:40:49 +01:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
c657d46437 FIR Java: add nullable (instead of not-null) type parameter bounds 2019-11-11 17:07:57 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
db11c14fee FIR Java: don't add type parameter bounds multiple times 2019-11-11 17:07:57 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov
e6bf3b3263 [FIR] Render nullability in type renderer, not in fir renderer 2019-08-22 10:55:07 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
2ceffa241b FIR: make Java default constructor visibility same with class visibility 2019-07-11 12:38:53 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
56435fa283 FIR Java: add default constructors 2019-05-28 10:20:40 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
0aaf8c7689 Fix FIR Java enhancement of java.util.Map & similar supertypes 2019-05-28 10:17:21 +03:00
Simon Ogorodnik
6c313895df [FIR] Do not enhance java fields to firProperty 2019-05-23 14:02:09 +03:00
Simon Ogorodnik
3e69838f48 FIR Java: map classes to make java type-parameters have correct bounds
Really, this commit implements early J2K mapping for all Java types.
It's questionable and probably wrong at least for super-types,
because, for example, we cannot resolve spliterator() in classes
derived from java.lang.Iterable
2019-04-30 18:45:51 +03:00
Simon Ogorodnik
6a0e3371ae FIR: resolve conflicts on multiple inheritance of fun with same signature 2019-04-30 18:45:50 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
092d10b1a8 FIR Java: fix creation & handling of type parameter symbols
Before this commit, we created type parameter symbols each time
when type parameter was referenced or created.
In this commit, we introduced class-bound Java type parameter stack
and use it to find referenced type parameter symbol.
So now they are created only when Java type parameter is created
2019-04-30 18:45:47 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
f8bb1d161a Fir Java: add type parameters to constructors and their return types 2019-04-30 18:45:47 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
2476c0299f FIR Java: fix constructor enhancements
Before this commit,
we generated regular member functions as constructor enhancement.
Now, we generate constructors as constructor enhancement.
2019-04-23 11:41:05 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
cf72b13d84 Add accessor symbols & test for property overriding in Java 2019-04-23 11:15:24 +03:00
Alexander Udalov
d257285c86 Load Java enums as final classes
In case Java enum has an abstract member, it has the ACC_ABSTRACT flag
set in the bytecode. However, we should still load it with final
modality to be consistent with Kotlin enums which are always considered
final

 #KT-23426 Fixed
2019-04-10 14:39:16 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
568e831651 FIR: make rendering of type parameters similar to original Kotlin 2019-04-10 13:31:02 +03:00
Simon Ogorodnik
498fb94c37 FIR: Make FIR rendering more kotlin-styled 2019-03-22 16:25:10 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
43d06f85e3 Add raw type comparison for Java (J2K mapping is taken into account)
NB: Java enhancement scope does not perform substitution, so we could
have some duplicates inside "type enhancement" testData

Related to KT-29937
2019-03-14 18:17:58 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
be412baf9f FIR type enhancement: fold flexible types when it's possible
Related to KT-29937
2019-03-14 18:08:01 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
6c8aba8039 FIR: support callable symbols in dependencies provider
This breaks mppFakeOverrides test because of bug in FIR fake overrides
2019-03-14 18:07:32 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
33fb3d154b FIR Java model: support static members & enum entries
Related to KT-29218
2019-03-14 18:07:17 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
14fb495ab6 Support Java constructors in FIR (related to KT-29218) 2019-03-14 17:57:13 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
7563a98999 FIR type enhancement: make J2K mapping and changed handling more exact
Related to KT-29937
2019-03-14 17:56:05 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
226cf8e42c FIR Java types: handle wildcard types correctly
Related to KT-29937, KT-29218
2019-03-14 17:55:25 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
6c79b184c0 FIR Java types: add Kotlin/Java mapping & mutability enhancements
Related to KT-29937
2019-03-14 17:55:10 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
e7ac88d326 FIR: implement Java fields (in provider, type enhancement, scopes)
Related to KT-29218
2019-03-14 17:54:53 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh
4255c9f774 Add FIR enhancement tests, fix some exceptions / problems around them
Test data and tests themselves are based on
compiler/testData/loadJava/compiledJava
2019-03-14 17:52:33 +03:00
Mikhael Bogdanov
8ce7112123 New tests for TYPE_USE annotations in enums and inner classes
Main test data  (testName.txt) a not totally valid cause of IDEA-205039.
 Javac test data (testName.javac.txt) a not valid
 cause of type annotations support absence.
 Runtime tests are disabled cause reflection support absence.
2019-01-08 13:52:45 +01:00
Mikhael Bogdanov
d2a205c72d Update synthetic parameter processing logic according to ASM 7 changes
#KT-27774 Fixed
2018-11-07 15:42:57 +01:00
Alexander Udalov
2f72f68e1a Fix loading class literal value void.class in reflection
#KT-27878 Fixed
2018-10-31 17:21:05 +01:00
Alexander Udalov
9df02b2366 Support Groovy $Trait$FieldHelper classes in new class file reader
Preface: for Groovy traits with fields, the Groovy compiler generates
synthetic "$Trait$FieldHelper" classes which posed several problems to
our class file reader, caused by the fact that the contents of the
InnerClasses attribute broke some assumptions about how names on the JVM
are formed and used.

For a trait named `A`, the Groovy compiler will additionally generate a
synthetic class file `A$Trait$FieldHelper` with the following in the
InnerClasses attribute:

InnerClasses:
     public static #15= #2 of #14; //FieldHelper=class A$Trait$FieldHelper of class A

i.e. the simple name of the class is `FieldHelper`, the name of its
outer class is `A`, but the full internal name is `A$Trait$FieldHelper`,
which is surprising considering that the names are usually obtained by
separating the outer and inner names via the dollar sign.

Another detail is that in some usages of this synthetic class, the
InnerClasses attribute was missing at all. For example, if an empty
class `B` extends `A`, then there's no InnerClasses attribute in `B`'s
class file, which is surprising because we might decode the same name
differently depending on the class file we encounter it in.

In this change, we attempt to treat these synthetic classes as top-level
by refusing to read "invalid" InnerClasses attribute values (they are
not technically invalid because they still conform to JVMS), fixing the
problem of "unresolved supertypes" error which occurred when these
classes were used as supertypes in a class file in a dependency.

1) In ClassifierResolutionContext.mapInternalNameToClassId, do not use
   the ad-hoc logic (copy-pasted from intellij-core) to determine class
   id heuristically from the internal name. For $Trait$FieldHelper
   classes this logic attempted to replace all dollar signs with dots,
   which was semantically incorrect: dollars there were used as
   synthetic characters, not as a separator between outer and inner
   classes.
2) In isNotTopLevelClass (Other.kt), only consider "valid" InnerClasses
   attribute values, where the full name of the class is obtained by
   separating the outer name and the inner name with a dollar character.
   This way, we'll be able to treat class files with invalid attribute
   values as top-level and avoid breaking any other assumptions in the
   class file loader.
3) In BinaryJavaClass.visitInnerClass, record all valid InnerClasses
   attribute values present in the class file, not just those related to
   the class in question itself. This is needed now because previously,
   the removed heuristics (see p.1) transformed mentioned inner class
   names to class ids correctly >99% of the time. Now that the
   heuristics are gone, we'll use the information present in the class
   file to map names correctly and predictably. According to JVMS, this
   attribute should contain information about all inner classes
   mentioned in the class file, and this is true at least for class
   files produced by javac.

 #KT-18592 Fixed
2018-10-25 22:15:22 +02:00
Alexander Udalov
c1ab08c8ce Refactor KClassValue to store ClassLiteralValue internally
Only invariant array projections and non-null element types will be
supported soon (see KT-26568), so it makes no sense to store the
complete type in KClassValue. What we need is only the ClassId of the
class, and the number of times it's wrapped into kotlin/Array, which is
exactly what ClassLiteralValue represents.

This change helps in decoupling annotation values from
descriptors/types. The only constant value that depends on descriptors
is now AnnotationValue.

 #KT-26582 Fixed
2018-10-25 16:27:23 +02:00
Kerooker
af5f78076c KT-7922 Added Boolean Companion Object 2018-08-30 14:51:04 +03:00
Ilya Gorbunov
4f76cdfc34 Use new annotations in mutability tests instead of old ones 2017-11-28 17:45:10 +03:00
e5l
62e87c873c Add annotation for parameter name in signatures 2017-10-06 15:45:37 +03:00
baratynskiy
01883a41cb javac-wrapper: refactoring, fixes and tests 2017-08-29 18:01:36 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
a0268d23bb Get rid of trivial allowFlexible replacing
As the type is anyway replaced with not-nullable version
explicitly, the only thing that changes is what type is loaded
for String[][].class:
- before it would be Array<Array<String?>?>
- now it's Array<(out) Array<(out) String!>!>

It's both a minor change and new behaviour can be considered
as correct
2017-07-03 17:55:37 +03:00
Denis Zharkov
c8a2de0243 Allow custom expected result for fast class reading tests 2017-06-24 17:26:02 +03:00