From d00d007306b39e1034b3bc35f19723c1cf855ffd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Klaas van Schelven <klaas@vanschelven.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:37:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Dockerfile(s): the afternoon's progress

---
 Dockerfile    | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 Dockerfile.db |  7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Dockerfile
 create mode 100644 Dockerfile.db

diff --git a/Dockerfile b/Dockerfile
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dc383b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Dockerfile
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+# Purpose: Dockerfile for the Bugsink project
+# Ubuntu 24.04 rather than the Python image: I want to stick as closely to the "recommended" (single server) deployment
+# as possible
+FROM ubuntu:24.04
+WORKDIR /app
+
+COPY requirements.txt .
+
+RUN apt update
+RUN apt install python3 python3-pip python3-venv -y
+
+# mysqlclient dependencies
+RUN apt install default-libmysqlclient-dev pkg-config -y
+
+# Venv inside Docker? I'd say yes because [1] PEP 668 and [2] harmonization with "recommended" (single server) deployment
+RUN python3 -m venv venv
+RUN venv/bin/python3 -m pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt
+
+COPY . .
+
+EXPOSE 9000
+
+CMD ["venv/bin/gunicorn", "--bind=0.0.0.0:9000", "--access-logfile", "-", "bugsink.wsgi"]
diff --git a/Dockerfile.db b/Dockerfile.db
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..96d4a1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Dockerfile.db
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+FROM mysql
+
+ENV MYSQL_DATABASE=bugsink
+ENV MYSQL_USER=bugsink
+
+# Expose the default port
+EXPOSE 3306